Sometimes you don't need hands, you need a second opinion you can show your board — or your team needs someone from outside to say the thing they've been saying for six months.
I read the codebase, the deploy pipeline, and the data model, then interview your engineers. You get a written report: what's genuinely risky, what's merely untidy, and what's fine despite looking scary. Everything ranked by expected cost, not by how much it offends me stylistically.
This is also the standard pre-acquisition technical due diligence read, if that's the context.
This is for you if…
- You inherited a codebase and need to know what you inherited
- You're raising, acquiring, or being acquired
- Velocity is dropping and nobody agrees on why
- You want a neutral party to settle a technical argument
Also available
Other ways to work together.
Django Consulting & Development
Senior Django help for the work your team keeps postponing.
Learn more →AI Workflow Engineering
Getting an LLM feature from a demo that works to something you can actually run.
Learn more →Python Deployments & Infrastructure
Getting your deploy process to the point where nobody dreads it.
Learn more →